A man stands while two people sit at a table in an office setting, smiling and engaged in conversation. The mood is friendly and collaborative.

Transforming a 16,70,000 sq.ft manufacturing facility from 2D planning to coordinated BIM delivery

Transforming a 16,70,000 sq.ft manufacturing facility from 2D planning to coordinated BIM delivery

The Challenge

A global semiconductor manufacturing leader planned a massive new facility in Gujarat, India spanning 16,70,000 sq.ft. However, the project began with a heavy reliance on 2D drawings limiting visualization, slowing coordination, and increasing the risk of clashes across disciplines.

The client needed a comprehensive BIM model that could not only support design coordination but also enable clash detection, modular construction, prefabrication planning, and long-term facility management. Micron- Case Study

The challenge was not just modelling it was building a digital foundation for an advanced manufacturing ecosystem.

Client’s Initial Hurdles

  • Limited visualization due to dependence on 2D drawings

  • Difficulty coordinating across architecture, structure, and MEP disciplines

  • Frequent design revisions without clear markups

  • Misalignment between design teams and BIM expectations

  • Need for a model usable beyond design for construction and operations

Why This Was Critical

Why were precise as-built drawings necessary?

The client was mid-way through construction. Any mismatch between actual site conditions and drawings could lead to misaligned interiors, service clashes, and rework all of which are costly.

Why not use traditional survey methods?

Traditional methods could not meet the required sub-3mm accuracy or match the speed needed. With parts of the structure already built, access was limited, making laser scanning the only viable option.

Why was lintel beam detection a sticking point?

Lintel beams are often partially or fully embedded, and even reality capture has limitations when elements are concealed. Still, the client needed these for structural validation and interior anchoring.

How did the timeline affect decision-making?

The 4-week deadline pushed for simultaneous workflows scanning, registration, modeling, and drawing production all had to overlap to deliver on time.

What would success look like for the client?

A reliable, intelligent 3D as-built model and structured document system that enables informed decision-making and safer, faster operations.

Gaps in Existing Information

  • Frequent design changes shared without clear revision markings

  • Vendors not fully aligned with BIM Execution Plan standards

  • Outdated drawings sometimes used for coordination

  • Inconsistent sheet standards across teams

  • Limited understanding of BIM processes among stakeholders

Why Specific Requirements Mattered

This was not just a modelling exercise.

The BIM model had to function as a single source of truth across design, coordination, construction planning, and operations.

Accuracy, version control, and collaboration workflows were critical to prevent rework and ensure reliable decision-making across global teams.

The Desapex Solution

  • Desapex delivered a multi-disciplinary BIM environment covering:

    • Architecture, Structure, Electrical, Plumbing, and Low Voltage systems

    • Key buildings: FAB, CUB, WHB, AOB, site infrastructure, and ancillary facilities

    • LOD 200–350 models aligned to project stages

  • Our approach included:

    • Developing coordinated 3D BIM models from 2D inputs

    • Continuous model updates based on design revisions

    • Clash detection and resolution across all disciplines

    • Vendor model coordination

    • Establishing sheet and documentation standards

    • Training teams and vendors on BIM processes and BEP compliance

    • Implementing revision tracking and structured change management

Project Timeline & Milestones

  • Project duration: 12 months

  • Key milestones:

    • Multi-building BIM model development

    • LOD progression across project stages

    • Federated model coordination

    • Clash detection and resolution cycles

    • Drawing generation and updates

    • Vendor coordination and standardization

Software & Technology Used

  • Autodesk Revit 2024

  • AutoCAD 2024

  • Navisworks Manage 2023

  • Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC)

  • Bluebeam Revu / Foxit Phantom

The Real Business Value Delivered

  • Enhanced BIM maturity: The client gained a deeper understanding of BIM workflows, improving collaboration and decision-making.

  • Improved visualization & coordination: Transitioning from 2D to BIM enabled better design clarity and faster clash resolution

  • Significant time savings: Reduced switching between tools and improved communication through centralized models saved substantial manhours.

  • Faster MEP decision-making: Real-time visibility of design updates enabled quicker engineering decisions.

  • Effective clash coordination: Focused coordination reduced clashes and improved installation planning.

  • Higher model quality: Structured quality checks ensured reliable, high-accuracy BIM deliverables.

  • Streamlined document management: ACC enabled real-time collaboration, issue tracking, and version control across stakeholders.

What This Means for Future Projects

For the client, this project became more than a modelling exercise it marked a shift toward digitally driven manufacturing infrastructure delivery.

For the project team, BIM transformed coordination from reactive problem-solving into proactive planning.

For Desapex, it reinforced our role as a digital transformation partner capable of building scalable BIM ecosystems for complex industrial facilities.

As semiconductor and advanced manufacturing projects continue to scale in complexity, this engagement demonstrates how a well-structured BIM strategy can move beyond visualization becoming the backbone for construction efficiency, collaboration, and long-term operational intelligence.